|
Back Pain
●
Degenerative Disc Disease Articles
●
Failed back surgery syndrome
●
Low back pain
●
Low Back Pain and Prolotherapy
●
Low
and mid back pain
●
Low back and sitz bone
●
Lower back injury
●
Lumbar back pain
●
Lumbar Spinal Fusion
●
Lumbar radiculopathy
●
Spinal Fusion
●
Back
Surgery-Spinal Fusion
●
Arachnoiditis
●
Ankylosing Spondylitis
●
BACK PAIN DIAGNOSIS
●
Loose Ligaments and Back Pain
●
Compression Fracture
●
Facet Syndrome
●
Sacroiliac Pain
●
Tarlov Cysts
●
SI strain
●
Prolotherapy
Spondylolisthesis
●
SPINAL DISC PROBLEMS
●
Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis
●
Scoliosis and Prolotherapy
●
Spinal Stenosis and Prolotherapy
●
Spinal Cord Stimulators
●
MRIs, Herniated Discs, Prolotherapy
●
Radiofrequency denervation
●
Women, Back Pain and Hormones
●
Exercises for back pain
●
Back pain and diet
●
Sacroiliac Blog
●
BACK PAIN BLOG
Treatment videos
●
Low back pain injections
●
Mid back Pfrolotherapy
Video articles
●
Failed Back Surgery
Syndrome
More Subjects
●
Ankle pain
treatments
●
Arthritis treatment
●
Back Pain
treatment
●
Elbow pain treatment
●
Foot pain treatment
●
Groin pain treatment
●
Head-Neck Pain
treatment
●
Hip pain treatment
●
Knee pain treatment
●
Rib pain treatment
●
Shoulder pain
treatment
●
Home
|
FREE
Prolotherapy e-newsletter
Free weekly privacy
maintained newsletter on Prolotherapy
and other non-surgical options
for the treatment of chronic pain. |
Other Prolotherapy Links
●
Prolotherapy Doctors
●
Bone Marrow
Prolotherapy
●
Prolotherapy
patient information
●
Learn about us
●
Prolotherapy in the news
●
Prolotherapy Links
|
People are confused because doctors, most commonly orthopedic surgeons, give them diagnoses that they do not understand. In one study, 51 surgeons were asked to give the four most common diagnoses used for patients with
low back pain and a total of 50 different terms were used. Some of the diagnoses were the following:
facet syndrome, mechanical low back pain,
degenerative disc
syndrome,
arthritis, degenerative instability, central
stenosis, failed low back syndrome,
radiculopathy,
herniated disc, spondylosis, sprain, fibromyositis, and about 35 other terms. (Fardon, D. Terms used for diagnosis by English speaking spine surgeons. Spine. 1993; 18:274-277.) This study was done in 1993, so there are probably another 10 terms by now! By and large, however, the terms used were just variations on the condition of the disc. The main focus in orthopedic surgery, as it relates to
neck and low
back pain, is that the source of the pain evolves from disc deterioration. Most surgeons would say the majority of pain complaints in the neck, mid back, and low back are from problems in the discs. This is why so many
MRIs and surgeries are performed.
Prolotherapy doctors do not have to argue this point. Even if this was the case (which we do not think), then the best treatment is still to strengthen the ligamentous support around the disc so it does not have to bear as much weight. Even if the discs are the cause of the pain, the treatment required is still
Prolotherapy.
Back Braces? Support or Folly?
Over the years, numerous studies have been done to see what would happen if workers wore back supports, belts, or braces. Would these help, hinder, or have no effect on the worker developing back pain? One study, for instance, took 312 workers at a major Dutch airline whose jobs included loading and unloading cargo pallets both manually and with a forklift truck.
These workers were randomized into one of four groups: lumbar support and education, education only, lumbar support only, and no intervention. The education involved three classes on proper lifting technique. Those in the lumbar support groups were to wear the lumbar supports at all times during working hours.
What happened? Thirty-five percent of workers experienced an episode of low
back pain during the intervention period and 10 percent took sick leave because of low back pain. The study found no statistically significant differences among the groups. The back supports did not prevent the development of back pain in these workers. (Van Poppel, M. Lumbar supports and education for the prevention of low back pain in industry. JAMA. 1998; 279:1789-1794)
One commentary on this study stated the following, "This is the fourth randomized controlled trial (the standard of modern medicine) to assess the role of lumbar supports in preventing low back pain in the workplace, and the third to show no effect. While an observational study has shown a benefit, the preponderance of evidence argues against the routine use of lumbar supports, particularly since compliance with their use, even in this setting, is so low. This study also raises the question of whether the use of lumbar supports in workers without back pain may actually increase sick leave. (Mitchell, L. Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of employer-issued back belts in areas of high risk for back injury. Journal of Occupational Medicine. 1994; January: 90-94.)
What about
back surgery?
Nearly 95 percent of all the low back pain occurs in a six by four inch area. This is the place where the fifth lumbar vertebra connects with the base of the sacrum and they both connect to the pelvis by various
ligaments.
Specifically, the lumbar vertebrae connect to the sacrum by the
lumbosacral ligaments, the sacrum to the iliac crests by the
sacroiliac ligaments, and the lumbar vertebrae to the iliac crests by the
iliolumbar ligaments. This is the most common area in the back treated by
Prolotherapy.
Patients often come in to our clinic with detailed stories about how an
orthopedist performed a discogram and CT scan, MRI, and various other x-rays, and is confident that they have disc problems. It is sad to say, but many patients who have been to orthopedic or neurosurgeons tell us that the doctor never even touched them when making the diagnosis that the pain was caused by a herniated disc or
pinched nerve. Many patients who have all kinds of disc abnormalities that show up on MRI and CT scan, say they didn't even know because they had no symptoms! Scott Boden, M.D., found that nearly 100 percent of people he tested, over age 60, with no symptoms had abnormal findings in their
lumbar spines on MRI scans. Maureen Jensen, M.D. and associates published in The New England Journal of Medicine the fact that only 36 percent of people with no back pain had normal MRI scans of the back. The conclusion to the study stated, "Because bulges and protrusions on MRI scans in people with low back pain or even radiculopathy may be coincidental, a patient's clinical situation must be carefully evaluated in conjunction with the results of MRI studies." In other words, DO NOT cut on a person based on MRI studies. Likewise, CT scans find a lot of abnormalities on people who have no back pain symptoms.
The Long Term Risks of Surgery
The back is a weight-bearing structure. It means that when any tissue is removed, whether it is bone or disc tissue, the likelihood of further long-term pain and arthritis is increased. The patient will often undergo a stabilization procedure with rods or bony fusion, including the areas above or below a previously operated on vertebral segment, because the area has become lax and degenerated.
Prolotherapy cures the back pain because it addresses the root cause of back pain-ligament laxity.
|
|
Ross Hauser, M.D.

Caring
Medical and Rehabilitation Services
Dr.
Hauser received his M.D. from the University of Illinois, Chicago; completed his
residency at Loyola-Hines VA-Marianjoy Hospitals in Physical Medicine and
Rehabilitation; and received his Bachelor of Science degree from the University
of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Dr. Hauser is one of the leading
experts in the treatment of chronic pain and sports injuries with
Prolotherapy.
He, along with his wife Marion, have written seven books on the
topic of Prolotherapy, a comprehensive book on the natural medicine
approach to cancer, as well as a myriad of articles and newsletters
for the general public. Read more about
Ross Hauser MD
|